Full description not available
M**T
Five Stars
Brilliant book
J**N
"Unecessary" quotation marks and CAPITALISATION made this book unreadable
Sorry to "do" this as I "hate" to LEAVE a "bad" review but "I" simply can't SAY anything good ABOUT the "actual" content of "this" book because I FOUND it totally "unreadable" due to the ridiculous AMOUNT of "unecessary" and very DISTRACTING "quotation marks" and CAPITAL LETTERS. It's the first time in my life I have thrown a book in the bin after 5 mins.
M**N
Book
Found the book very repetitive i think some meanings were lost in translation
J**S
One of the wisest humans I have ever read, a True Master
I have studied everyone and this guru is one of my absolute main men. He makes Advaita Vedanta sing. He teaches me more about life in a single paragraph, a singly AMAZING paragraph, of his speech, than most can with their whole lives. I AM THAT is his banner work, but I read everything I can get by him, transcribed from his oral teachings in every case. Extraordinary. Indescribable. You must read him if you are sincerely interested in the nature of the universe and your soul. But you will have to grow to get him. I've been studying him steadily for five to ten years, and I learn more every time I read him.
N**V
Another Masterpiece
A nice continuation to I Am That
N**K
Five Stars
A MUST have book for knowing your self.. Thanks
C**T
Alles OK!
Alles bestens
C**R
Very good pointers to understanding Nisargadatta's teachings
To me, non-dual teachings must abstract from the truth in an attempt to describe that which cannot be described nor realized by our dualistic illusory state. It becomes a snake eating its tail. For that reason, you cannot understand Nisargadatta's teachings. But go ahead and try. Why not? If you were a robot functioning within its parameter programming, would you want to know what you actually were? And then perceiving that your own intelligence was just parameter programming would you go further to find the source of your self awareness only to find that it too was part of the parameter programming? Would you then try to go further because after all, "Neti Neti"? Like eating a bag of chips, once you have eaten one, you really just have to have another, and then another until the bag is empty. Then what?
Trustpilot
1 week ago
1 week ago
