







🎯 Level up your game with LG UltraGear 4K — where speed meets stunning visuals!
The LG UltraGear 32GQ750-B is a 32-inch 4K UHD gaming monitor featuring a VA panel with a rapid 1ms (GtG) response time and a 144Hz refresh rate via HDMI 2.1. It supports HDR10 and covers 90% of the DCI-P3 color spectrum for vivid, lifelike colors. Equipped with AMD FreeSync Premium, it delivers tear-free, low-latency gaming. Its gamer-focused design includes built-in stereo speakers with Waves MaxxAudio and ergonomic adjustments, making it a top-tier choice for immersive, high-performance gaming and multimedia experiences.


| ASIN | B0BVSQ9M8F |
| Are Batteries Included | No |
| Best Sellers Rank | #80,054 in Computers ( See Top 100 in Computers ) #2,120 in Computer Monitors |
| Brand | LG |
| Color | Black |
| Customer Reviews | 4.2 4.2 out of 5 stars (684) |
| Date First Available | 1 October 2023 |
| Item Weight | 9.12 Kilograms |
| Item model number | 32GQ750-B |
| Manufacturer | LG |
| Number of HDMI Ports | 2 |
| Power Source | AC |
| Product Dimensions | 27.69 x 71.37 x 49.78 cm; 9.12 kg |
| Resolution | 3840 x 2160 Pixels |
| Screen Resolution | 3840x2160 |
| Series | 32GQ750-B.AUS |
| Standing screen display size | 31.5 Inches |
M**D
Amazing
Very Very good condition 240hz 98% DCI-P3 Very amazing For gaming and video editing and color grading
D**Y
I had this model months ago but used it and I kept tinkering around with it to see any visual or performance differences between HDMI 2.1 and DP 1.4a in HDR and 240hz. I was able to see differences - which I thought was ODD since HDMI 2.1 had greater bandwidth and was newer. To put it short, DP was quicker, had whiter whites at similar adjustment and it allowed me to get into the BIOS, which HDMI does not even display the BIOS screen! DP with DSC is the only version that allows you to get 1440P/HDR/10-bit color/240hz. HDMI 2.1 allows those with room to spare. I then tried those settings with DP 1.4 with no DSC, and it will not allow anything above 144hz. I found that odd since DP specs say that it is doable. From gaming, I found that DP 1.4 @144hz AND @240hz DSC, reacted quicker than HDMI 2.1 (both with the latest, high quality official cables) and gaming textures appeared more realistic and more detailed. Of course, I am wondering how this was possible - but that is what I got! I also noticed that when I gamed with 2.1 and DP DSC @240hz, performance took a hit - which I again thought was ODD! Colors even looked washed out @240hz - gaming and Windows. I was starting to think that LG was using 240hz as a marketing gimmick and it was really a 144hz monitor pushed to 240hz by monitor software. Then I thought - the overdrive in the monitor pushes it to 265hz, so something else was up. Anyway, I just kept checking this out online, mainly for pricing - just out of curiosity. I like to see if I got the best deal. So, I look on Amazon and I see that it is going for about $150 LESS than I paid not long ago. For some reason, Amazon did not want to give me the price difference and save a return. I am glad that they did not!!! Today, I get the replacement model and although the box was damaged - this replacement was manufactured on 07/2022 and the previous was 05/2022. I decided to look at the dates once I hooked the new one up and immediately noticed TWO things - NOT LAG @240hz, and more luscious and distinct colors! This was at 240hz, so I decided to run more tests! THIS TIME, I immediately noticed MORE color, MORE detail and more freedom in HD/4K movies, gaming and internet! I viewed the same scenes from Book of Boba Fett, and on the other model, it looked great, but nothing special. On this replacement - it looked liked something special! This time, I could see the stitching in the clothing and difference textures on Fett's helmet, along with totally distinct colors and extreme detail! The difference as clear. In gaming, I started up GTA V Online and more details were clear and the city looked more realistic as colors were more localized for whatever section of the city had whatever color scheme. There were more minute details in effects and textures. Most importantly - @240hz - it was SMOOTH, CLEAN, QUICK, with no lag! This was on DP 1.4a and HDMI 2.1! Textures were more realistic and brought greater effect! This time, it also seemed as if the greater bandwidth in HDMI 2.1 was showing. However, both performed greatly. Maybe the replacement had a newer firmware, allowing the full bandwidth of both inputs, or the old one just had some issue holding them back. Either way, I am happy that I switched out, as I save money AND get better performance! Lastly, I don't want a 4K monitor, as I don't want my PC having as good or better quality as my TV - even though watching live shows on this monitor @240hz DOES bring in better quality than the TV. Sometimes I imagine if seeing 4K @240hz would look even better... UPDATE ONE: I noticed some edge bleeding along the bottom and it turns black into a cranberry or faded look. As much as I love the performance of THIS one, I may have to exchange it. I just hope that the next one has the uniformity of the first one but with the quality and performance of the second one. They SHOULD have better quality control at this price point. Part of me wonder if I got a 4K panel reduced to 1440P. We will see.... UPDATE TWO (12/19/22): I did receive the new one and I did get the best of both worlds! I now have the black and more uniform display of the first one, along with the performance and detail of the second one - despite it having been manufactured on 6/22. I feared for the worse, but now I can safely say that this is it and I am satisfied. I went over all materials that I had gone over with the 2nd model and blacks in the corners are black and not emitting a cranberry color light and watching movies or anything is now more even with a much better presentation. Blacks are blacks (as far as LCD's go) and colors are backed by black and actual white, without the cranberry coloring infringing on the picture. The only small detail is that it is not quite as detailed as the 2nd, but it is close. Maybe the extra light did something to the picture, but the added blacks on the 3rd reinforce the picture. I knew that constantly seeing that cranberry coloring in the corners would always be on my mind, and I am glad that I made the switch. Hopefully this will be the last monitor that I buy for years. There is STILL the issue of colors looking richer from Displayport than on HDMI 2.1 @240hz, despite HDMI having more bandwidth. I still find that odd. I thought that both had the same color capabilities. I also tried 260hz and I have not noticed any oddities and it made the picture a little sharper and more detailed. This seems like the best overall deal for a monitor with HDMI 2.1 and the other features. If you do get a different brand, make sure it has DP 1.4a if it does not have HDMI 2.1. Lastly, the 240hz picture - be it watching videos or playing games, looks very clean and clear and dare I say better than a 4K TV. It reminds me of 1080i vs 1080P. UPDATE THREE (7/1/2023): LOL. Yes, another update. I thought that I should add, that I originally used a separately purchased HDMI 2.1 cable and all of the above applied to that. I JUST got around to switching to an unlicensed Pacroban white cable that I bought about 3 years ago - and that, for some reason, gave an instantaneous improvement in bandwidth! I don't know if it was what it was made of or what, but when I was playing GTA V online, everything was rendered with all setting maxed out! Even MORE details came out with small particle effects such as glass being shot out, explosions, smoke, debris in the air, cars that look even more like painted metal, rocks that look more realistic and with more depth! Best of all - ZERO latency and when I moved the mouse around, the 48gbps HDMI 2.1 bandwidth, finally felt as if it had the bandwidth to spare! However - it get's even better!!! I put the licensed cable on my 4K TV - and THAT one greatly improved the picture quality similar to what I just described for my 4k Sony player! So... I decided to use the licensed cable from another brand and hook it up to my PC - and what I just described was the same - but better!!!! There must be some internal differences between cable quality, as I used to keep trying to decide if the DP was better and why the HDMI 2.1 seemed no better than DP. NOW, it is a no contest! I ditched the DP cable and now the HDMI 2.1 is a the CLEAR-CUT winner! Add to that an NVIDIA update that now allows the BIOS to be accessed through HDMI, and now HDMI 2.1 is where it is at all the way. The improvement is so great, that I now give this monitor the full five stars instead of four! NOW - I have the experience that I expected from this! it is crazy how after a year, my mind is blown even more so!
A**A
Procuraré dar la mejor reseña posible en el poco tiempo que tengo con el monitor. Es mi primer monitor de alta gama y valor (o tal vez, gama media alta), y es la renovación de mi setup, por lo que no podría dar referencias con respecto a otros monitores del mercado. Antes que nada, trabajo como programador y estoy de home office, lo cual puede ser relevante para ti si es que buscas un monitor que se adapte tanto al trabajo como a la hora de jugar. Menciono esto, porque primero tuve 2 monitores VA baratos de 24", al principio eran buenos y siguen siendo buenos para gaming, pero para trabajar, después de un tiempo comencé con molestias en los ojos, tras un periodo de estar viendo el código, me lastimaba levemente los ojos, ya que, los ángulos de visión eran realmente malos en esos monitores, por lo que decidí comprar uno de 32 igual VA de LG (el que se muestra a la izquierda en las imágenes) y el salto en calidad fue superior, con ese ya no me dolieron los ojos, veo las cosas desde mejores ángulos y el brillo es superior, incluso podía comprar otro similar y quedarme con ambos. Pero, para ser sinceros, algo le faltaba y es que, al ver las orillas, como que se ve oscuro y no me deja ver el scroll para navegar por el código o las páginas web. Entonces, después de ver reviews y comparativas vs el Odyssey G7, al final decidí comprar este monitor para ver si con eso ya no tendría problemas de ningún tipo... Y realmente superó mis expectativas!!! El monitor luce increíble en sus acabados, tiene esas luces traseras que lo hacen lucir aún más caro de lo que está, el diseño es magnífico. Y lo más importante, la nitidez, brillo de la pantalla, los ángulos de visión, los colores, pff, todo mejora con creces incluso contra el otro monitor que tengo, lo opaca en todo sentido! Para trabajar está más que perfecto, no tengo ya ninguna queja o detalle que le pueda encontrar, el brillo lo tengo al 30 y siento que ya se ve bien, brillante, contra el nivel 50 en brillo que tiene el otro monitor. Ustedes pueden ver la comparación de colores en el gaming contra un monitor VA de menos precio a pesar de que es de la misma marca (LG UltraGear). Por lo que se aprecia, la representación de colores es abismalmente mejor, sin duda compraré otro monitor de estos para cambiar el que tengo de menor gama. Con respecto al ghosting, a mi parecer prácticamente es inexistente, verificando las reviews que vi en inglés donde hacen el UFO test, tampoco no he encontrado fugas de luz (ojo, en la cámara parece verse algo extraño, pero saben que, a diferencia de una cámara, el ojo humano lo interpreta distino), el ips glow la verdad no soy muy experto, pero la verdad es que no me quejo nada en todos esos temas que podrían preocuparlos. La conexión por USB funciona excelente y en el monitor tengo conectado un micrófono el cual reconoce sin problemas. Aún no hago pruebas con todos los ajustes y parámetros que tiene el monitor, en mi caso no lo veo necesario, ya que casi no juego competitivo. Veredicto final: 10/10 es excelentísimo para jugar y para programar es una chulada, contenido multimedia y ocio más que de sobra.
D**E
This is a nice monitor, nothing flashy but the picture is good. I use it as a secondary monitor so I haven't done any gaming on it
A**N
I tried it for my PS5 on 4K with 120 hz, great for shooter games with minimal delay 1 ms. The only issue is with the brightness as it is too bright if in a dark room, but all in all a great screen, would give it 4.5
I**E
I'd been using an Acer Predator XB271 27" 1440p monitor for several years, but as time went on, I found myself noticing its flaws more and more. Throw in chronic dry eye and back problems that were forcing me to make a real effort to address my tendency to hunch forward, kind of grainy looking text, flat colors and ghosting becoming more obvious, and I decided an upgrade was due. I spent weeks debating between whether to go 27" or 32", 1440p or 4K, mostly afraid that 4K would tank my framerate too much, or 32" would be too big, on and on. In the end, going for a 32" 4K was absolutely the right decision, and the 32GQ950 is everything I hoped for and more. Sharpness, clarity, backlight bleed and black uniformity are all massively improved, colors pop in ways my Acer never did, and I'm able to set the monitor much further back while also sitting further back. The peanut gallery on sites like Reddit tend to slag this monitor for having high pitch fan noise and fake HDR. I can only speak to my own experiences here, but I haven't heard any sort of fan noise at all, and while the HDR is admittedly not "proper" HDR like a FALD and the dimming zones are limited, it still looks very nice with HDR on, provided you calibrate it. Even the basic Windows HDR tuning utility does wonders here. It may be just because I'm coming from an older 1440p that I think it looks nice, and if your primary focus is HDR above all else, or you just loathe IPS glow (and there is still some), then you'll probably find the 32GQ950 lacking. Personally, I think until "proper" HDR monitors get their response times, input lag and flickering issues under control, none of them are worth buying. Your average HDR-centric panel, while it may look nicer, also likely has response times and input lag that are worse than my now 6 year old Acer. If it's a VA, throw in a big pile of flickering. If it's OLED, you get to worry about burn-in and sub-par brightness. Pick your poison. If there is any particular thing that sets the 32GQ950 apart, it's that this is arguably one of the fastest 4k displays on the market, hits 160Hz, and it'll pass 10-bit color over DP at 160Hz. The Rtings review will indicate that 160Hz is unstable; I can confirm it is absolutely not unstable at all, and anecdotally, I'm actually finding that 160Hz with the response time set to Fast runs better than 144Hz set to Normal or Fast, with no discernable differences in ghosting or frame judder. In terms of performance, esp for those nervous about 4K general, I'm running this with a 4070 Ti and can easily hit upwards of 100-160fps in Diablo 4, Borderlands 3, Cyberpunk 2077, Resident Evil 4 Remake and others, with most settings cranked to max, though you may need DLSS in some situations. I've been shocked how well things actually run and most of my anxiety about my system being able to handle this resolution turned out to be no big deal. All in all? Zero regrets and I'm extremely glad I didn't bother with another 27" 1440p, a 27" 4K or a cheaper panel with higher latency and response like the Gigabyte M32U. I can't see myself upgrading for a long time and who knows, maybe by then miniLED IPS panels will actually be a viable option. Til then, you're not likely to find a better balance between performance and visual quality than this.
Trustpilot
1 week ago
1 month ago