There Is a God: How the World's Most Notorious Atheist Changed His Mind Paperback – November 4, 2008

As a person who is well into their senior years, my insatiable thrust for knowledge the last 7 decades has taken me on a journey from the scientific to the esoteric, and from topics from A to Z. Like many independent thinkers I began as a young true believer in the mystical, turning agnostic in my late teens and early 20s, finally an atheist in my middle 202 and early 30s. Now that I am old and wiser I realized we do not have all the answers to life, death and God.This is why while browsing on Amazon when I came across this fantastic 222-page soft cover book (There is no God: How the world’s most notorious atheist changed his mind by Anthony Flew with Roy Abraham Varghese) I decided to purchase it.I had read several of this author’s books in the past when I was a dogmatic atheist; however, now that I have grown intellectually and spiritually in my old age, this book is a refreshing and thought-provoking volume that I loved reading.The excellent book is organized into two parts. Part one focuses on his denial of the divine, which covers how the early evidence he sought out led him to atheism. Part two deals with his discovery of the divine, where it became clear to him that we had no true scientific answers to the many mysteries of life, death and the cosmos.In my own personal research into quantum physics and cosmology I also came to question how and where the entire cosmos came to be and many other unknown issues humans are still intellectually wrestling with at this time. I loved this book and if you have also questioned our place in the universe and how it all came about, this is a book you may want to check out.Rating: 5 Stars. Joseph J. Truncale (Author: Never trust a politician: A critical essay about politics and politicians).

In 2004 the atheist world was rocked by the news of one of the most important defections from its ranks in recent times. The world's leading atheist, Antony Flew, announced that he was no longer an atheist, but a theist. This of course sent shock waves through the anti-theist camp, since they had long been claiming that rational and reasonable people only choose unbelief, whereas believers can only be regarded as stupid, gullible and deluded. It is pretty hard to describe Antony Flew in those terms.Indeed, given his credentials, this is an amazing book about an amazing intellectual about-face. For over 50 years Flew was the number one proponent of atheism. And as a world class scholar with over 30 books on philosophy in print, he was one of the twentieth century's most imposing intellectual figures.In this book we hear about the reasons why he has abandoned atheism and embraced its counterpart. The significance of this turnaround can be seen in part by the ugly attacks and bitter responses by fellow atheists. They have made it perfectly clear that Flew has committed the unpardonable sin here. Their crude and ugly attacks on him and his decision is a telling commentary on the intellectual shallowness, bigoted fundamentalism, and narrow-minded intolerance that characterises so much of the new atheism.The first half of this book is a brief intellectual biography of Flew. Here we learn about how he was raised in a Christian home; his decision to embrace atheism at age 15; his career as a professional philosopher; his numerous important works on philosophy; his time as a Marxist; his encounters with such intellectual heavyweights as C.S. Lewis, A.J. Ayer, Gilbert Ryle, Wittgenstein, and others; his debates with Christian theists such as Lewis, Alvin Plantinga, Richard Swinburne, William Lane Craig; his debates with fellow atheists such as Richard Dawkins; and his six decades as a dogmatic atheist.The second half of the book deals with why he finally felt compelled to abandon his atheism and embrace theism. He offers three main reasons for his defection, (or apostasy, as many fellow atheists regard his move). The first bit of evidence he cites is the fact that nature obeys rational and ordered laws. The second is the fact that we are intelligently organised and purpose-driven beings. The third is the very existence of nature itself. The brute evidence of nature, in others words, has led Flew to recognise that "the universe was brought into existence by an infinite Intelligence".He expands these three points in some detail, and demonstrates how any open-minded examination of recent scientific discoveries can only point in one direction: that matter alone is not all there is, and a supreme intelligence must be directing what we observe in nature.All the reasons offered in this book are based on an honest assessment of the evidence. Flew had made it a life habit to follow the command of Plato attributed to Socrates, "We must follow the argument wherever it leads".Flew rightly complains that so many atheists are simply stuck in a narrow box, where prior faith commitments to naturalism preclude an honest evaluation of the evidence. It is so easy "to let preconceived theories shape the way we view evidence," he says, "instead of letting the evidence shape our theories". Flew's willingness as an honest atheist to follow the evidence where it leads finally led him out of the barren sands of atheism into the refreshing oasis of theism.He notes that many leading scientists today "have built a philosophically compelling vision of a rational universe that sprang from a divine mind". Eminent scientists and scientific thinkers such as Max Planck, Erwin Schrodinger, Werner Heisenberg, Paul Davies, Francis Collins, John Polkinghorne, Roger Penrose and Stephen Hawking all acknowledge that there must be more to reality than what is offered in the materialist worldview.The various new discoveries - be they in astronomy, physics, cosmology, genetics or molecular biology - all demonstrate intelligence, purpose, order, design and complexity, the most obvious explanation of which is an intelligent designer.Flew of course takes on all the various challenges to such thinking, be it the multiverse scenarios, the functionalism of Dennett, Stenger's notion of symmetry, or Dawkins' idea of selfish genes. Concerning the last of these, Flew had long been a critique of this idea. "Genes, of course, can be neither selfish nor unselfish," he says, "any more than they or any other nonconscious entities can engage in competition or make selections". Indeed, natural selection "does not positively produce anything. It only eliminates, or tends to eliminate, whatever is not competitive".Even though this is a brief book of just 200 pages, the cumulative case for the inadequacies of atheism and the necessity of theism is here very nicely and compellingly made. And given the one making the case - the world's leading atheist for six decades - this book needs to be seriously read by everyone.Flew makes it clear that he is not a Christian - at least as yet - but is basically a deist. Deism says that there is a creator God, but such a God has no ongoing relationship with the created order - a bit like an absentee landlord. He says his journey to theism was based on reason alone, not faith, and he has yet to decide about revealed religion.He does inform us however that if he were to embrace a revelational religion, Christianity would be the best choice. Indeed, he finds the arguments for Christianity persuasive, and is now exploring the evidence for this as well. He is even impressed with the central truth claim of Christianity, the resurrection of Jesus. In fact, he allows New Testament scholar N.T. Wright to have a concluding chapter in this book, making the case for the resurrection.So as an honest seeker, he is more than willing to consider the claims of Christ. But for the honest atheist, this book offers a persuasive case for the claims of theism. As Roy Abraham Varghese argues in another appendix to this book, "we have all the evidence we need in our immediate experience" for theism, and the only reason why people remain in atheism is a refusal to look at this evidence.In this hugely important book Antony Flew challenges all of us - atheists especially - to honestly and sincerely examine the evidence, without preconceived biases and agendas. Genuine intellectual honesty demands that we indeed follow the evidence wherever it may lead.

This was a great book! One has to realize the magnitude of his change of mind. This would be like Billy Graham announcing he no longer believed in God a few years before his death. Flew was the most prominent atheistic philosopher of the last 100 years. Dawking's is small fry compared to him...-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------The first half of the book is autobiographical and tells of the formative events in his life. He makes it clear he has changed his mind on numerous issues over the years as a result of study and debate. He also notes his major impacts on philosophy.The second half lays out the various lines of evidence that caused him to change his mind about the God question. One has to do with the orderliness/set of laws in the Universe that made it suitable for life: they did not have to have this very precise tuning that was necessary. Another has to do with the origin of life as there is no valid naturalistic explanation for the encoded information in the DNA and necessarily coinciding mechanism for self-replication. His final argument has to do with consciousness. It is not reducible to physicality. This book ends with an essay by a fellow philosopher who expounds upon this final point only to be followed by another essay in which Flew has a dialogue with N.T. Wright over the question of God's revelation in Jesus Christ.Flew ends his book convinced the God of Aristotle exists. He mentioned the fact that this God has the exact same attributes as the Judeo-Christian God and said he came to his conclusions based on scientific and philosophical grounds alone. As for special revelation, a comes to no conclusion but states it is possible if a god exists. He also notes Christianity offers the most plausible case for special revelation and he has never read a better case than the one laid out by Wright in this book.-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------As a side note, Flew notes he is now a Deist when he begins his book. He also states he does not believe in an afterlife and his position on this has not changed from the position he had as an athiest. This should dispell any notion that he changed his mind because he was near death and hoped for an afterlife. Reading this book also convinced me he had not lost his mind as his arguments were quite lucid: well-reasoned and clear.