Self-Editing for Fiction Writers, Second Edition: How to Edit Yourself Into Print ― A Professional Writing Guide on "Show, Don't Tell"

One of the biggest surprises I encountered as a new author was the reality that writing the first draft of a book is the easy part! Sadly, I've learned that my free-flow, stream-of-consciousness way of story telling doesn't end up on the page as anything even close to what most people would expect from a best-selling novel. Of course I knew that I was going to need to edit, but I thought that editing was basically a spelling/grammar check followed by a quick read-through looking for any wrong words/typos that might slip through the software. WRONG! This was the first book I bought after coming to that realization, and it is still my go-to for quick-hit tips (and now reminders) on good editing practices. The authors do a great job of leading a novice writer through important editing concepts like "show don't tell", writing good dialogue and the proper use of "beats" to keep readers engaged. Each of the twelve chapters focuses on an attribute of good writing, and the core concepts are explained clearly and supported with multiple helpful examples. There are lots of nuggets of sage advice sprinkled throughout the book, but I found my favorite in chapter one: R.U.E or "resist the urge to explain". As a one-time corporate learning professional, I appreciate the author's use of checklists and practice exercises at the end of each chapter to reinforce what you learned. The checklists are handy quick-references that I refer back to frequently, and the exercises incorporate relevant examples that make it easy for you to apply what you just read. This book won't turn you into a professional editor over night, but it will help you improve the quality of your writing and give you a solid understanding of what professional editors look for. I used what I learned from this book to self-edit my first novel, and I was thrilled when the editor I hired told me that she thought I was a professional author with multiple books under my belt (I have one). Most of us are limited in how much we can spend on our writing habit each month but, trust me, your investment in “Self-Editing for Fiction Writers” will be money well-spent!

The two authors of this book formerly worked as editors for the publishing house Stein and Day, headed by the master writer and editor Sol Stein. Stein and Day published some of the greatest literature of the 20th century. In addition to his being an editor and publisher, Sol Stein is also an award-winning playwright and bestselling fiction author. On top of that, Stein wrote what are probably the two best instructional books of the craft of writing _Stein on Writing_, and _How to Grow a Novel_. I tell you all that just so you'll know the environment that helped shape the two authors of this book. They truly know their craft, and have proven it repeatedly. Stein himself has said that every fiction writer should read this book at least once a year. As for me, if Stein's two books are the most important books a writer can study, then _Self-Editing for Fiction Writers_ is tied for third with _The Elements of Style_. Just like Stein's books, the strength of this book is in its ground-level focus on the craft of editing, giving concrete and easily-digested examples and explaining things in a way you don't need a degree in English to understand. And it avoids any lofty or highbrow theory that is of little use to the average writer. No kidding--you sit down and read this book today (it's a quick read) and your writing will be better tomorrow. This book is especially valuable for those who are pursuing publication, as (so it's said) the publishing houses don't edit like they used to. So the closer your book is to a finished product when it hits the desk of the person who will either buy it or reject it, the more likely they will do the former than the latter. How important is editing? One need look no farther than the original published (and heavily edited) version of Stephen King's _The Stand_. That version was a fantastic book that was reviewed well and sold (as everyone knows) in the millions and still sells to this day. Contrast that with the version published later, the "expanded edition" that was King's original manuscript before an editor laid his axe to it. Bloated, confusing, tedious, and (for this reader) practically unreadable. All that fat the editor cut turned a bad book into a great one. A good example of the fact that the editing is every bit as important as the writing. If you're a writer, and hope to get published, there are very few books that will be as valuable to you as this one. And yes, Mr. Stein, I still read it at least once a year, if not more.

This textbook is one that was strongly recommended for a class that I am currently taking. It covers a fair amount that can be problematic, especially for writers who have not previously been published. It covers such topics such as show versus tell, characterization, exposition, point of view, voice, and more. There is a lot of useful and helpful information in this book, along with examples of what the authors are talking about. There are also exercises in each chapter for the reader to put into practice what each lesson was about. The “answers” to the exercises are at the end of the book rather than at the end of the chapter with each exercise. I personally would have preferred them to be on the pages immediately after the exercises themselves, but being able to look at a potential solution to each one is in itself helpful, no matter where in the book it winds up. I would recommend that anyone reading this book attempt to complete them as it lets you put into practice what you are trying to learn. They are useful and the explanations on their answers are also helpful in teaching the why behind the choice to change the passage in certain ways. At times, this felt very much like I was reading a textbook, which is what it is, however that aspect does at times make it a little less interesting (causing it to feel a bit "dry") to me than the previous book assigned in this class. But overall, I believe this is a helpful and useful book for anyone seeking to not only improve their writing, but who is seeking to improve their self-editing skills in order to strengthen the impact of their stories.

If you're even considering the thought of editing your own work, whether it's a full length novel, novella, short story, flash or whatever other piece of fiction you have, go out and buy this book now. Read it cover to cover. Take notes. Read it again. Do the exercises. Relate it to your own work. Read it again. And again. And again. This book highlights what really are some of the most obvious fallacies a writer can make and it does it in the most poignant of ways. Everything they say is in the simplest terms. No bushes are being beaten and they don't cut any writer any slack. Chances are, your manuscript has at least three of the fatal errors outlined in this book. At the very least. More likely, it has nearly all of them. I'm unashamed to say that the latter is me, to one extent or another. Probably one of the greatest things to come out of this book is the acronym R.U.E., Resist the Urge to Explain. This carries over in multiple chapters, from reiterating explanation in dialogue to redundant points being made and back again. I found that a common theme in many of the editing points they make boils down to over-explaining. Writers want to press the point so badly, and make sure the reader understands exactly what they're saying that that they'll flog the dead horse explaining it. Often the author, usually subconsciously, doesn't trust the reader to get it so important points are reiterated at the expense of the reader's intelligence. As I write my fanfiction (yes, I write fanfiction) I'm more conscious of writing mistakes that I knew I shouldn't be making but it's something I need to re-reference in the book. For example, using dialogue tags such as "she said as she twirled her hair around her finger" are markedly amateurish. This is actually one of the points in the book I have the hardest time with. I get it but if the action is relevant, I don't see how it can weaken the writing. Here's a little further explanation on this from a comment I made on the original post-- . . . Chapter 11, Sophistication. According to the authors, "Both the 'as' construction and the '-ing construction' as used above are grammatically correct and express the action clearly and unambiguously. But notice that both of these constructions take a bit of action ("She pulled off her gloves") and tuck it away into a dependent clause ("Pulling off her gloves . . ."). This tends to place some of your action at one remove from your reader, to make the actions seem incidental, unimportant. If you use these constructions often, you weaken your writing. The two examples they gave are, "Pulling off her gloves, she turned to face him" and "As she pulled off her gloves, she turned to face him." They then go on to say-"We're not suggesting that you avoid these phrases altogether. There are going to be times when you want to write about two actions that are actually simultaneous and/or genuinely incidental-actions that deserve more than a dependent clause. And given the choice between an 'as' or '-ing' construction and a belabored, artificial alternative, you're well advised to use the 'as' or '-ing.' But be aware that hacks have long ago run these useful constructions into the ground. Learn to spot them in your own writing and, if you see more than one or two a page, start hunting around for alternatives." This is the second to last chapter so most of the points made in this one and the following are more about fine-tuning the work after all the other stuff has been fleshed out. The authors are crazy adamant about eliminating hacks (I can't count how many times they repeat the word) so any style common in hack writing, they've pounced on. So it's not that it's wrong, it's just more of an easy, lazy way out. And I know I'm guilty a hundred times over, at least. I still have the most trouble with that one and I'm more inclined to think they've just seen that technique used so much in writing that they want to see alternatives. Too much of anything is bad technique but I think this is the only borderline point they made. I also see flaws in works that I read, ones that I didn't see before, especially in web serials, because of this book. I bite my tongue, of course, because I'm not these people's editor and it's much more than just an improperly punctuated sentence but this book has made me so much more aware of others' flaws as well as my own weaknesses. For instance, I'm getting better at spotting redundant text in writing but that's still very hard for me. My eyes see someone making a point, not beating me over the head with it. That's another chapter I need to read again (as if I'm not going to read all of them again, right?) because I want to soak in all the information, make sure I'm getting it right and apply it to my own work. I want to recognize the redundancies, not just on a small scale but a much larger one in order to make my book better. It comes with learning to be a better editor that the ability to look at works more for fun kind of starts to fade. It becomes harder and harder to turn that editor off and just read, especially after reading a book like this. I just have to keep telling myself to shut up and read because I like the story. But I think that's a small price to pay in order to make my work that much better. I can chain the inner editor up when I'm not using her, even though I might be able to hear her screams but I'd rather have that than no inner editor and novels that should never see the light of day. So if you want to edit, you want to do it well, do it right and make your manuscript as good as it can be, pick up this book. I've even made it super easy for you. You don't even need to leave your seat. Just go to my Amazon widget to the right and click until you find the book and buy it. I promise you, you won't regret it. Really, there's a reason why every writer I've met, both in person and over the internet, recommends this book to edit their novels. Just remember, these are not hard and fast rules. Keeping to them too strictly will just result in sterile writing and you don't want that. Listen to your own judgment and make the call based on that.

This year I plan on finishing my debut novel, this book is amongst one of the most helpful books that share absolute gems with great examples to help self edit your book. Writing your book is only the first part, editing is where the work truly begins. And even though editing can be outsourced, this book really helps you look at your writing critically and helps you pinpoint why certain paragraphs or areas of your book weren’t working. At times you probably subconsciously knew that something was wrong, but you couldn’t put a finger to it; this book brings to light all those areas so that you can spot it right away and know how to fix it. This book called me out in the best way and I am so excited to edit my book and make it better!

You feel so good when you know you have self-edited to a polished degree. The editor doesn't have to do so many red markings and even says great things about parts of your story. This is an invaluable aid to self-editing. Very clear and comprehensive. One point to keep in mind. There are many smaller editing tips that should have been corrected already by a writer, before following the other aspects in this book. If you are embarking on self-editing for the first time, this is Book 2, in a way.

I bought it in a print edition, because I need my checklists in hand when I'm editing. This book has streamlined my practice both as an editor of my own work and as a critical reader of other writers. The illustrations of the difference (and value) of both showing and telling are worth the price of the volume, and I can attest to more than one recent project in which this question alone saved the book from chaos, and its author from despair. My personal favorites are the excerpts from The Great Gatsby and other published work, in which we watch the vividness and specificity increase under the intensive questioning of the editor. That's the real secret of great editors: asking the right questions. Each chapter ends with a handy list of such questions. Their value will become apparent with repeated use. The only thing I would suggest adding is an overall guide to levels of structure. In working with both student writers and early-career writers (fiction and nonfiction alike), I notice a fatal tendency to zoom in on fine details when it's the big structure that needs attention first. The book does not discuss developmental editing and grand plot or outline issues as much as I would like. However, every serious writer and editor is going to own more than one craft book. This is one of the books that needs to be on that short "go-to" shelf. It makes revision to second draft and beyond very much easier. It's an excellent manual for anyone likely to find themselves in the role of editor, and the lessons can be applied beyond the scope of fiction; vividness and specificity are virtues for nonfiction writers as well, and many of the same techniques apply. Writers, this volume will help you get your work into a shape that will make your professional editor very much happier. You'll get the worst of the lumps out of your prose, and you'll recognize good editorial questioning when you hear it.

OK, I love this book. I have so many post-it flags hanging on the page edges that my cat is entertained while I read. There is really good advice, examples of the concepts explained, and exercises to put them into practice. I have put my own writing through several of the exercises and they are really enjoyable to do.

This book is incredible, packed with examples before and after the edit. It has exercises and proposed "solutions" at the end of the book. I wish all books on writing were as insightful as this one. The authors explain the craft with crystal clarity, no obscure terms are used, no obfuscation of meaning, just the essence. 100% pure educational value. Love it. Please write more books like this.

This book is brilliant and full of excellent advice. Knowing what the work of an editor entails has made me a much better writer! Personally, I will still hire someone to edit my book but self-editing it first will make their job easier so that they can focus on the things I might have missed. If you're a language nerd (like me) and want to self-edit your book you should DEFINITELY read this book first!!

Una lettura indispensabile per chiunque si voglia cimentare nella scrittura di narrativa. Anche in un' epoca dove l'intelligenza artificiale aiuta molto del self-editing, questo testo è tra i fondamentali per capire cosa funziona e cosa no in narrativa.

This book has become my bible. I'm happy. Now I know where I am going and where I'm supposed to go. It's hard work of course, but a really fun one.

Good read - helpful insights