Mars Gear Vulcan TAC Outdoor Tactical Pants

I wear "tactical" pants almost exclusively for work and as an outdoorsman. I typically stick to 5.11 and a few other big names but decided to give these a shot. They are pretty good but have a few draw backs. First, the fit is somewhat tight in the butt and thigh when bending down or squatting or taking a knee. I ordered a little big to compensate, bit since the material does not stretch like 5.11, it is still slightly restricting, not a major issue. My other issue is the Velcro closures for the cargo pockets and rear pockets. The Velcro seems a bit weak, and anyone who lives through the ACU era of the army will tell you, Velcro kind of sucks on tactical pants. All in all seventh pants for the price and I may order more.

I'm a 230lb big guy with big hips, legs, and waist. Depending on the brand I wear a 36 or 38 waist. I usually have a problem fitting into jeans and other pants made for regularly sized guys. 5.11's I wear a 36 in Stryke pants. I put these on and was able to button them without the elastic even coming into effect. Huge pants. Fit like oversized pajamas. I was thinking these would be somewhat fitted like 5.11 Stryke pants but not even close. I don't think going a size down would work, and I've never worn 34" pants. The picture makes it seem like these are fairly fitted, but they aren't. They're like parachute pants.

I love the style and the pocket configuration. However, these pants are very stiff, even after washing, and the elastic gathers in the waist are uncomfortable. This is likely due to the stiffness of the material. My biggest complaint is likely NOT the fault of the manufacturer. I have a low waistline and these pants are apparently designed for those with high waistlines. For me, the crotch is so low that it makes it difficult for me to walk. The waist size and leg length are correct. Like I said, this is likely due to my build.

I bought these as I have been searching for a replacement for Blackhawk’s excellent but discontinued warrior wear performance pants, so please understand the review is colored by that perspective . Like those, these have 12 pockets, which is why I chose them.I like that the cargo pockets on these are deep. Deeper than those on the BlackhawksI like the little change pockets on each side instead of only in the right pocket. I keep change in the left pocket, so the Ambidextrous nature is nice.I like the cut of the back pockets better than the strange slits that the Blackhawk uses.I don’t like that the cargo pockets do not have magazine dividers. That really helps with storage of gear.The magazine/cell phone pockets on the front of the pants and in the cargo pockets are big enough for an iPhone 6s in case, but all of them are woefully inadequate for an iPhone XS Max in case. The Blackhawk has zipper pockets that will hold the XS max.The seam on the knee on mine rides up and digs into my knee when bending my leg at about a 90 degree angle.They are cut baggy in the crotch and seat. That’s a matter of subjective preference, but may be useful for someone to knowI haven’t had them long enough to low how they’ll wear or if the pocket flaps will curl.

These fit well, but they are definitely taller than your average 30in inseam. I didn't measure them, but the legs are longer than any other pair of pants that I own in the same sizes. This might be nice to keep them from riding up above your boots when crouching/kneeling, and accounts for ANY boot heal height. The legs aren't TOO long, just longer than normal. Waist fit exactly as sized.Quality is good so far, only worn them a couple times.

Im a corrections officer and these are the best pants I've ever had. I'm 6'2 195lbs the 32x34 fit me perfectly. Pocket setup is a great layout and easily accessible while on post. Very light weight and durable.

Overall, they were good pants. I had quite a few issues with durability, especially in the crotch area, as you can see in the Pic. Bought two pairs of these in 2019, and I tore the back left pocket almost off when getting into a vehicle, and I bought a third pair after that. All three have ripped crotches, and I patched all three. I've worn them almost a year now, and they're covered in stains.Other than the durability and the staining, I love these pants. The design is great, the pocket locations are super convenient and huge. There has been no wear on my knife pocket or holster location, and the knees are reinforced. If you do a lot of shooting and moving, or dealing with hazardous chemicals and oils, these aren't bad, you'll just need to replace them every few months. Which isn't too difficult as they're a great price. I just wish the crotch was double reinforced or elastic.

The sizing in terms of measurement seems correct. I ordered a 38 waist, 30 length based on reviews that these run small. They DO NOT run small. Do bottom-heavy, pear-shaped, fat men love these pants? I am 20 lbs overweight. I can wear a 36 waist but sitting pinches my gut in most pants. Wearing a 38 waist hangs a little loose but is more comfortable to sit.Vanity sizing in pants is usually 2.5 inches: meaning, if you buy a pair of pants with a waist of 36 inches, the actual waist of the pants will be 38.5 inches in many brands of pants. These pants' waist measure 39.5 inches, so 1.5 inches of vanity sizing instead of 2.5 inches. However, the main problem is the seat and thighs are absolutely enormous. The elastic waist is not even stretched out on me. So I am agonizing over returning them for a size 36. Inseam actually measures 29 inches instead of the stated 30 inches length, but are way long because the crotch run is very long.Comfortable, heavy pants, with plenty of crotch room but way TOO MUCH room in the seat and thighs. Material is heavy, like snow boarder pants or snow pants without the insulation. These are LOOSE fit pants. These are not regular fit and not even close to a slim-straight fit. Beware and buy accordingly.