React Design Patterns and Best Practices: Build easy to scale modular applications using the most powerful components and design patterns

This is a very good book.I read this book on Friday 09/29/2017 and returned to work at Florida Blue (Blue Cross Blue Shield) on Monday 10/02/2017 to present the things I learned it. All who attended loved the content and I attribute all of what I learned, what they learned, and their happiness with my presentation to this book. I linked this book at the end of the presentation and I am sure you will receive more sales because of it.Thanks for the great book.

- Great content- Lots of sample code- I particularly like that it mentioned lots of npm packages

Great introduction to react. I learned alot.

So far one of the best Packt books I have read. I'm not done with the book yet but in the first four chapters alone there are some good tips and tricks. The "Living style guides" section was something new for me. I have piles of component and every time I need one it always takes a little time to get my bearings regarding what it needs, what it will look like, what kind of styling properties will need to be applied, etc. I started a new project that needed some new components (map pointers that need a size and color props) and decided to use styleguidist to document them and I am sold. These are simple map pointers and already I can see the advantages.I am reading this on a Kindle Fire and keeping notes but if it continues to be as good as it has been I may buy the paperback so I can use it as a quick desk reference.

Great book. Covers a lot of interesting topics, such as testing, universal applications. Book is based on the latest libraries (webpack, jest, ...)

Probably the best React book out there right now. Not for the absolute beginner.

Easy to read book.

Not good

Disappointing how the book is about React.js basics that other sources cover as well e.g. reactjs.orgWhat it provides though is a collection of well known approaches that one might apply in their codebase.I expected something a lot more advanced and scientifically written than this so thus the low rating.