Rossini: William Tell French Version

Friedrich Schiller attracted several 19th century composers wanting to make operas of his historical dramas. Verdi succeeded with Don Carlos (with much rewriting), and Verdi and Tchaikovsky each had good things (and lesser) in their operas on Joan of Arc. Rossini set the mold for grand opera with his attempt - Guillaume Tell. He also garnered criticism for having so much love interest for the tenor. But this is an amazing opera. THere are moments that speak to us like the serious moments in any Rossini opera, and there are moments that reach forward at least 50 years. No wonder Berlioz, Wagner, and others praised it. The trouble is that there is just so much of it.Any recording of the work deals with the length either by performing everything or else making cuts. THe first recording I encountered was the Cetra recording. Cetra Soria edition had good 1950s sound. The Everest edition managed to muck this sound up in pseudo-stereo. There are still great performances to turn to there. Giuseppe Taddei IS tell. He ruminates bitterly at the beginning, and leads the finale to the opera with wonderful voice. His "Resta immobile" is to the top, moving, and yet never over done. Mario Fillipeschi played Arnoldo, and he tosses high Cs and C#s out there as if they were easy. Giorgio Tozzi joins them in a fabulous trio in act two. Gessler is portrayed by a young Fernando Corena, who drips sarcasm. Matilda is Rosanna Carteri, and her "Selva Opaca" is far above those of more famous and more recent sopranos. Mario Rossi reduces the opera to 2 hours and 45 minutes. While that's hardly short, most conductors are much closer to 4 hours. Graziella Sciutti is Jemmy, and Plinio Clabassi is Melchtal. THe sense of drama pervades every measure. It was my first full opera recording, and it set a standard many other recordings miss.There was a highlights recording with Tony Poncet as Arnold on Philips. I've never heard the whole thing, but Arnold's aria and his duet with Matilda (act two) are marvelously sung. His top notes are not easy, but they are certainly there. I think Jean Borthayre sings Tell.EMI-Seraphim issued a highlights recording, too. Nicolai Gedda and Ernst Blanc starred. It was strange that EMI issued this, when only a couple of years later, they had the first full French recording.Gabriel Bacquier is Tell there. He is good, but the top was already getting iffy. He, along with Taddei, at least has the required highs and lows. Gedda was just a little past prime, but he was still a formidable singer. He sings every high C. Montserrat Caballe portrayed Mathilde, and she is good and bad. She sounds outside the drama. She also sounds at times like she barely knew the role. THis is true of many of those singers. Mady Mesple, the Jemmy, is okay, but her voice is too bright. Gardelli paces the opera cautiously. He is the better conductor, but it is Rossi who captured the awesome expanse of the last finale (Gardelli is too fast and perfunctory there.)Gedda is on yet another set. He is good, Eva Marton is too big a voice for Matilda, and Peter Glossop is William Tell. All his intellect can't disguise his non-Italianate sound. Muti conducts well. The sound is bad.Muti conducts another set, Giorgio Zancanaro (the Tell) has an unfortunately dry voice that wanes quickly on the bottom. He just isn't strong enough. Chris Merritt made a career of Arnold and Arnoldo (either language suited him). Cheryl Studer as Matilda is stylistically at sea. She tries hard, but there is too much coloratura for her to handle easily.Decca/London issued another Guglielmo Tell late in the careers of Milnes and Pavarotti. It is one of Pavarotti's greatest recordings. He sings well and is totally involved. Sherrill Milnes' voice was beginning to get cloudy in the middle, and this role sits rather low for him. His isolated high notes are great, better than anyone else's Nicolai Ghiaurov does not find Walter Furst (the Tozzi role) nearly as comfortable. Mirella Freni sounds good, but she had passed her coloratura days, and some of the role sounds labored. Her aria is not her best work. The lesser roles are adequately taken. Riccardo Chailly takes some tempi awfully fast. It gives certain scenes a rushed quality that would be much better without it.I have not heard the Thomas Hampson recording from Vienna. But, unlike the above, it is undoubtedly cut some.This brings us to the new recording. The edition follows a new edition by M. Elizabeth C. Bartlet. She based her edition on the changes that were made after the score was printed (before production.) This deals some cuts in the score that Rossini may have agreed to, but I doubt he liked them. Like Porgy and Bess, you can't go only by what was included in the first production. The "Buzzard Song" was cut before the premiere of that opera, and yet Gershwin recorded it a year later with Lawrence Tibbett. Here, the recitative before the act one ballet (roughly 4 pages in my piano-vocal score) is omitted. This cuts Tell's wonderful "Gessler orders our vows." It also makes a strange key change before the beginning of the ballet. In Act five, the whole scene of the trio and prayer for Mathilde, Jemmy and Hedwige is cut. Yet some moments include music no other recording includes. The first CD could have accepted that one recitative. The last CD has plenty of space for the trio and prayer. So why are they cut?Ah, but the performance has some major performances to contend with. I regret to say Gerald Finley isn't one of them. His Guillaume Tell starts out well. But he is clearly singing perfectly but removed from the drama. He puts in studied nuances, true, but there is just not enough honest, full-out singing. His aria is not terribly interesting. (Another cut comes in that scene, too). Compared to Taddei's Arrow scene, Finley is just not enough. Tell is an outspoken patriot, and Finley seems too much like a philosopher. John Osborn, however, is a major find as Arnold. He is not quite as stentorian as either Fillipeschi or Pavarotti, but he is better than Merritt, and artistically on a par with Gedda. He can still be understood even when singing repeated high Bbs! He tapers phrases to make the words retain their true accents. Malin Bystrom is Mathilde, and she too is incredible. Her "Ombre foret" (Selva opaca) is so limpid, and her high notes have body to them. The coloratura she tosses off in Act three is amazing. Celso Albelo, the fisherman, starts the whole proceedings tossing off his little serenade (and high Cs) with the ease that many others could only wish for. Marie-Nicole Lemieux portrays Hedwige well. It makes the cut of her best scene more regrettable.Antonio Pappano conducts with great attention to dynamics, a wonderful sense of pacing, and he even manages to convey the sense of drama that a live performance gets. Some of his ballet work, however, is totally graceless, squarely conducted and beat through. Compare to the work of Rossi (not nearly as famous as Pappano) and you can hear phrase after phrase dance in the old recording that plods here. The audience only applauds at the end of acts, with the exceptions of the Overture, the act two duet (Mathilde and Arnold) and the great scene for Arnold - "Asile hereditaire - Amis, mes amis." The latter is a forerunner of Alfredo's act two aria (Traviata) and Manrico's great aria in Trovatore.A word must be said about the dynamics of the recording. It is something invading movies now, too. Live theater can afford to have the PPP sections really hushed. But in home listening, when I crank up my system to accomodate hearing the quiet moments, I am subsequently blasted out by the orchestra and choruses. The Horn and bells in the beginning of act two (both offstage) are basically inaudible.) The orchestral interjections in the recitative to Arnold's great scene are also inaudible. Come on, engineers, I know that modern recordings CAN capture that wide range, but I don't like to be so painfully blasted away. My automatic volume controls don't apply to CD listening. A pianissimo pizzicato in the strings might just need a little boost.

This is a beautiful recording... It is beautifully sung, beautifully conducted, and even beautifully recorded. Furthermore it is sung in the original French and if ever there was an opera that has its musical outline so precisely integral to the form of the French language it is Guillaume Tell. When sung in Italian translation as in the bulk of recordings something seems quite wrong. As such it is a must have for any Rossinian... but... and somehow you knew there was going to be a "but". The problem is that this recording is a virtual representation of how the opera was presented during its initial run at the Paris Opera in 1829. However, not all of the music Rossini composed was included in that initial production and there lies the main difficulty. Such was usually the case with many of the massive operas that were composed for Paris. Rarely was all of the music composed performed in any given production.In the case of Guillaume Tell Rossini not only deleted some music (mainly the aria for Jemmy in the third act) before the opera's score was published, but also made some changes after the score was made available in print and before the premiere performance. However, while some of the changes were made on purely musical grounds, some of the modifications were made due to staging problems and circumstances surrounding the original production, one of which was the opera's excessive length. Rossini being a practical man of the theatre often did not hesitate to alter his scores. However, for a recording where problems of extreme duration or of staging are not a consideration... and given the fact that recordings of this opera in the original French version are not exactly a dime a dozen... it is a pity that such a decision was made. In any event, most of the truncations involve the final act where the exquisite trio and the powerful prayer that follows it are not performed. This reduces the final scene of the opera to a string of recitatives prior to the glorious finale interrupted only by the orchestral interlude depicting the storm... which storm suddenly appears as opposed to increasingly making its mark on the already distressed Swiss countryside during the powerful and ardent prayer mentioned above.I mention this because while these matters are touched upon in the associated booklet, they are addressed in a piecemeal fashion that does not specifically spell out the details of the excisions. While a listing of each cut and variation in the score is beyond the scope of this review, it would have been helpful if they had been specifically mentioned in the notes accompanying the recording. To Pappano's credit, the one place that he does not adhere to the original production concerns the orchestral introduction to the second act. Here he does not take the repeat that was added simply to allow enough time to get all the choristers and extras on stage... again a situation unique to the original staging. It is a pity that Pappano did not use a bit more common sense regarding that final scene as it seems sacrilegious to omit such beautiful music and in the process completely destroy the contours of that scene. I would bet the farm that Rossini himself did so only reluctantly.At any rate, the score as presented is performed as well as one would be likely to hear it today and as such it is a worthy successor to the earlier EMI recording with Bacquier, Gedda, and Caballé. Pappano's conducting even complements that of Gardelli on the earlier recording. Gardelli has a more expansive view of the score. He is leisurely, pompous, and at times a bit turgid. Pappano in contrast is all about pace and momentum. Indeed while the final moments of the tenor's cabaletta are just a trifle too fast... most of the tempi he chooses move the opera at a judicious if swift pace. The major exception is that amazing ensemble that concludes the opera. Here Pappano unhurriedly and gradually builds to a climax... then holds back a bit and then swells to an even greater climax. One can palpably feel the rays of sunshine enveloping the Swiss mountainside during this remarkable paean to liberty... certainly one of Rossini's finest inspirations and as such a fitting conclusion to this most extraordinary of Rossini's operatic masterpieces.As for the singing, while the vocalists on the new recording offer the new school of Rossini singing, they don't present with the uniqueness of vocal sounds that were the hallmark of singers a generation or so ago. As an example, while Malin Bystrom is quite good (actually excellent) and offers a powerful representation of Matilde's plight in both vocal and dramatic terms, she does not possess the unique vocal qualities of her counterpart Montserrat Caballé. That is perhaps not a fair comparison as Caballé was a singular vocal talent (especially in her use of pianissimi) and in the earlier recording was captured at the near peak of her powers. In contrast, tenor John Osborne as Arnold is more comfortable with Rossini's vocal writing than was Nicolai Gedda... but there is a slight loss of overall authority and weight. Still, Rossini probably would have preferred the lighter voice of Osborne who tends to caress the higher reaches of this most treacherous of tenor roles in a more gentle fashion. In the title role I would rate Gerald Finley and Gabriel Bacquier as basically on par vocally though Bacquier does obviously have the advantage on idiomatic grounds. As for the supporting cast, both recordings are equally well cast though I slightly prefer Elena Xanthoudakis in the recording at hand in the trouser role of Jemmy.Still, as a representation of Rossini's final operatic composition as he oversaw it at its premiere run of performances this recording is very useful. Furthermore, the natural sounding live recording is representative of what current technology has to offer. Happily there is virtually no audience noise during the musical numbers and applause is confined to only the most obvious places and is gladly kept to a minimum. The earlier EMI recording is much harsher in sound, but does present the opera as originally published and as a supplement even includes the aria that Rossini composed for Tell's son Jemmy just prior to the scene with the apple, but ultimately wisely deleted prior to publication as it holds up the action at a critical point in time. As such it is an invaluable document... and if one is willing to have two versions of this extraordinary opera on their shelves these are the two recordings to have. However, if I had to choose one and only one it would be the earlier recording simply due to the greater quantity of music performed... and in spite of its less than pleasant sonic attributes. Plus, the expansiveness of Gardelli's conducting seems a bit more apt given the scale of Rossini's conception, not to mention Caballé and her exquisite pianissimi.In summation, I can't emphasize enough that what is performed is on as high a level as is currently possible and as such is more than worth the price of admission. Indeed, given the performing edition, for the avid Rossini collector this recording is essential if only as an insight to how composers were often forced to make compromises when dealing with theatrical working conditions. However, for the general collector both the omitted final trio and prayer are indeed worth the price of the additional fourth disc of the earlier EMI recording.Finally, a word about the packaging which has the discs encased in cardboard sleeves, as such retrieving them is a bit cumbersome and awkward. Also, a bit more thought could have been given to the break between discs two and three which occurs in the middle of the ballet when the entire second scene of the third act could have easily been accommodated on the third disc.

There is so much in Rossini's mammoth opera which hints at middle Verdi that those, who recognise Rossini in works like Barbiere and L'Italiana, will be amazed coming to this work for the first time at the sheer dramatic verve and musical depth to be found within it. Rarely done on stage because of the demands on the singers, particularly that of the tenor Arnold, I have only seen it once, in Paris in an excellent production with Thomas Hampson as Tell. I was impressed then by the sheer dramatic scope of the work. Of course, there are parts where you hear Rossini churning out standard stuff, but there is much wonderful music here.The performance recorded live in Rome under the baton of Antonio Pappano, benefits from brisk speeds, which cover some of the duller patches in the score, particularly in the first act. Gerald Finley is a commanding presence as Tell and John Osborn, who I recently saw in another killer tenor role - Raoul de Nangis in Meyerbeer's Les Huguenots, is excellent and has a voice which thrills without sounding strained. Malin Bystrom is also fine as Princess Matilde although she cannot eclipse Caballe in the role on the old EMI recording.In short, with excellent singers in the subsidiary roles, this is a performance which can be warmly recommended. I did not find a problem with the sound quality, playing the discs through a blu ray surround system.Live performances of course have pitfalls and it is always irritating to hear calls of bravi! In the theatre it is fine but on disc such noises are a distraction on repeated listening - easy to remove - EMI take note!I will not part with the old EMI studio recording with Bacquier as Tell but this new one, available at an exceedingly low price, can be heartily recommended.

This is a fine recording with Gerald Finley outstanding but I'm puzzled by the disfiguring cut in Act 4. The libretto says it's scenes 5 and 7 that are cut but I think it's scenes 5 and 6 which include a trio for Mathilde, Jemmy and Hedwige and a prayer for Hedwige together with a musical build-up for the approaching storm and some helpful plot exposition. There's about ten minutes of rather good music gone and with someone as talented as Marie-Nicole Lemieux on hand it seems perverse to cut her only solo. Anybody any idea why this was done?

fine

great fun

Unbeatable - and gets right around the unfortunate visual aspect to ROH performance of July 2015.