Studs TerkelWorking: People Talk About What They Do All Day and How They Feel About What They Do

This book was originally published in 1972, and made quite a sensation. I was in college at the time, and, having worked in a gas station for five years, was intrigued. However, while I read several reviews, I never got around to actually reading the book--until now. What I found so intriguing was what Mr. Terkel did--interview a number of common Americans who worked in mostly mundane, low-paying jobs (such as I had), and, in using their own words told their story.Louis "Studs" Terkel was a writer who liked people, especially people who worked hard for a living. Besides being one of heck of writer, he was also an actor, and radio personality. He received the Pulitzer for Literature in 1985 for "The Good War--An Oral History of World War Two". He was nicknamed "Studs" while acting in a play with another person named Louis. To keep the two straight, the director gave Terkel the nickname "Studs", after the fictional character he was playing—Studs Lonigan.Besides interviewing common workers--coal minors, steel workers, janitors, itinerant farm workers, nurses, barbers, airline stewardesses, telephone operators, gravediggers, etc., he also interviewed people in high-end jobs--business executives, coaches, professional athletes, school teachers, lawyers, stock brokers, a studio head, and a media personality (film critic Pauline Kael). In particular, Ms Kael's comments about working people are most telling; she knew of the endless, mind-numbing hours of being a common worker, because earlier in her career she had been one. While this book is imminently quotable, I have chosen Ms. Kael's comments because they summarize best what it's like to be a bottom-level worker: "I've spent most of my life working at jobs I hated. I've worked at boring office jobs. I never felt they were demeaning, but they exhausted my energy and spirit. I do think that most people work at jobs that mechanize them and depersonalize them. . . ."This book is endlessly fascinating, but at 589 pages takes time and patience to wade through. Still, if you've ever been a bottom-level worker, or wish to know what it's like, you will appreciate the truth that is contained in these pages. Five stars

Author signed copy from someone's personal collection...WINNING!!!

Having my son read about different jobs.

Studs Terkel's classic book "Working" is nothing more than a large volume of transcribed confessions of working people. The concept is deceptively simple, but what it reveals about a common activity that unites all of humanity is often truly surprising. Do you hate your job? Guess what. Most people do! Terkel gets workers from waitresses and steel workers to dentists and ad executives to confess what's really in their souls and how they really feel about what they do to make a buck. The surprise is how universal many of the feelings we have about our jobs truly are.One of the most striking things to me is how little has changed in the intervening 40 years since the interviews contained in "Working" were first collected. When describing work, nostalgia runs rampant among Americans. We look back longingly to the days when America was a mighty manufacturing powerhouse, when we domestically produced much of what we consume. We often think about steel or car manufacturing through a gauzy haze. "Working" clears the haze away and reveals a far less rosy truth: manufacturing work is often robotic, dehumanizing, and physically punishing. Men who do this work have no love for it and their bodies often pay a steep price for it. They didn't view it as romantic or noble then and they probably don't now. It's just a means to make a living wage.Of the dozens (and dozens) of interviews in the book, a series of common themes are present. Here are the ones that caught my attention.There's a recognition among long-time workers that profit is king over all. The people who produce product are mere cogs in the machine.Everyone has a secret dream job, what they imagine they'd rather be doing, where things would be better somehow.Even if people don't like their jobs, they're often proud of their personal ability, how fast they can complete a task, how accurately, tips they've learned through years of experience. They possess hard-won knowledge that took years to accumulate.Laborers often see management as oppressors who play for a different team. They're to be thwarted in petty ways whenever the opportunity presents itself. It's often a game to occupy time or a way to build camaraderie amongst peers. "How can we get back at the Man?"People recognize there own limitations and don't necessarily want to be treated as equals, but they do want to be respected, no matter what their station. They want others to recognize their value, that the product or service being offered by the company wouldn't be viable without their efforts. They know that society couldn't produce a steel beam or a car or serve hot meals to people who demand them if it weren't for them. These jobs lack status and glamour, but the world would stop without them.The "old days" are always better, no matter what era you grew up in. Nostalgia for a better past is universal. There's a feeling that "back in my day, there was craft to the job, now work's just robotic or talentless." Also, "kids today!" and how they lack drive or commitment is a common refrain. There's nothing new under the sun.40 years ago people were already complaining that the days of company loyalty were over, the idea that you could work for one firm for a lifetime and be rewarded or valued were a thing of the past.Corporate life is empty, and corporate success an illusion. Big money managers are petrified of the hotshot youngster nipping at their heels, angling for their job. They worry about their age, that they're disposable once they're over 50. Executives report feeling a moral hollowness about their work. As one of the interviewees put it "in the business world, in order to do a better job, you have to become ruthless. In order to make more money, you have to care for people less. In order to succeed, you have to be willing to stab your competitor in the back."People who have found ladder-climbing to be an empty pursuit stop hungering for status and no longer care about it. When that happens, they're free to pursue their heart's desire, or something that makes them feel like they're truly contributing to the world in a meaningful way, in a way beyond making profit for a corporation.Many jobs are "too small for one's spirit." People need to feel challenged in order to be fulfilled. A job which is secure and pays adequately may mean complete misery if there's no challenge or sense of meaningful contribution.

An amazing work when the reader can sit back and appreciate what previous generations of workers went through for themselves and for their family. We owe a lot to each previous generation. Let's not lose sight of what hard, and sometimes unreciated, work means to the self.

Love this book. Seller delivered above expectations, so kudos to that. Would be a great read for all generations.

I knew they used book would come in “good “condition but I didn’t realize the first few pages would have water damage

Great book, I bought this for a friends birthday because it’s one of my all time favorites.

This is studs turkel's greatest work in my opinion and it is still as relevant today as it was when it was first written. The personal accounts from regular people are engaging and fascinating!!😀

どんな仕事をしているの、と尋ね、その答えを録音、活字にした、だけなのだが、それが何十、何百人となると、読者の頭の中に社会と人々の様々な生活と意見が一つの小さなピースとして次々はめ込まれ、最後には何だか大きな姿が浮かび上がって来るような思い（錯覚！？）にとらわれ、あっと驚いてしまう。ターケルさんのお得意の手法。アメリカ研究の金字塔。それに加えて、市井の人々がくだけた普通の英語で話しているので、英語表現や感覚を学ぶのにとても役立つ（受験英語を卒業した人向け、勉学推薦書No.1・・・個人の感想です）。

Great, thanks for making the delivery in time.

I'm still amazed that so few people in UK have even heard about Studs Terkel, in several ways the most powerful, original, and human writer of the 20th century. This book is as good an introduction as any, once started you will want to read more. He is the grandfather of virtually all oral historians.Julian Tudor Hart

People saying what they think about their own lines of work, what bothers them, what makes them tick. A fascinating read.