The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture

This is an important book on a vastly important subject: the destruction of our system of higher education and the fact that the forces at work there are now reaching into the wider realm of American society and spreading the corruption into new areas. The author uses an interesting metaphor. She suggests that the University of California (or an individual campus) is now two institutions: Cal 1 and Cal 2. Cal 1 is the great university of the past, built upon the development and transmission of knowledge, the amelioration of human ignorance, the reduction of disease, the expansion of the human imagination and the dispersion of knowledge to corners of society that previously lived in darkness. Cal 2 is something altogether different: a vast and vastly expensive bureaucracy subscribing to the beliefs that identity politics are paramount, western history is a trail of tears involving victimization of the marginalized, that patriarchy reigns and lives to despoil the lives and spirits of women and minorities, that the university represents a culture of rape and dominance and that the university's principal role is to reduce the oppression, comfort the oppressed and bring them to the forefront of power and influence. Cal 2 has now largely supplanted Cal 1, particularly in the humanities and soft social sciences and the apparatus that leads that process is in place to intimidate presidents and chancellors and hold a damoclean sword above their heads that threatens them with charges of racism, homophobism, heteronormativity and so on which will destroy them if they should be so bold as to challenge the status quo. Those charges will be applied ruthlessly, without regard to fact or logic since facts and logic are in disrepute following the depredations of the French Nietzscheans and other voices of postmodernism and poststructuralism. One might call this neoRousseauan, given Rousseau's contempt for civilization and the rationalism of the Enlightenment, but Rousseau is a dead white male and is to be silenced along with his brother voices from the past.This is a problem. It is a problem for many reasons, not just because it is destroying higher education, but because it has, at the end of the day, simply not worked. Minorities are not thriving. Their test scores remain lower than, e.g., Asians and whites; their graduation rates are lower. Their indebtedness is higher. Their pass rate on the Bar exam lags behind, and so on. The solution has not been to raise expectations or (Heaven forfend) question the incidence of single-parent households, out-of-wedlock births or the injunction to not 'act white'. The 'solution' has been to further reduce expectations, to remove such obstacles as standardized tests and conventional methods of instruction. Again, this has not worked, and so the diversity bureaucracy (or 'industry' as it is now often termed) is expanded beyond all reasonable bounds. Fifty million more dollars of endowment and a dozen more deanlets, deanlings, associate vice provosts, directors and vice-chancellors just might do the trick.The book consists of four broad sections: Race, Gender, The Bureaucracy and The Purpose of the University. The arguments are factual, logical and rational. There are a few major takeaways: the processes at work here are truly delusional; the processes at work here are incredibly expensive though there is precious little evidence of their success; the processes at work here are expanding rather than contracting, and, perhaps most important, the processes are hurting the people they are most designed to help (except for the fact that the processes are creating a bureaucracy that provides a plethora of well-paying jobs for those operating what is, ultimately, a cruel scam).I have read Heather MacDonald's work in the past and it is scrupulously fair, informative and on point. That is certainly true of this more extended study of a subject that she has addressed on several previous occasions.The question that haunts me is how and why we have permitted all of this to happen? Part of the reason is that the academic leaders of the past have been replaced by corporatists prepared to scrounge tuition dollars and protect their own positions at any cost. These individuals advance themselves by creating new programs and expanding the number of their 'direct reports'. "Diversity" is an area that will always go unchallenged by sympathetic faculty regardless of the fecklessness of the activities or, indeed, the detrimental effects on the instructional budget, the internal research budget and faculty salaries and faculty hires. The corporatists know that they can never defend courageous counter actions by principles, facts or logic because we are at war and the cui bono forces within the industry will seek victory by any means and at any cost. There are also doubtless a number of individuals who are 'true believers' and some who seek to signal their virtue through bien pensant actions and stances. The delusion may not result in positive, authentic results but it soothes and salves egos to a considerable degree. It is also fair (but 'outrageous' to say) that some portion of the student activism in this area is motivated by a desire to bypass requirements that might be in the students' best interests but are not part of their desired lifestyle. Calculus is difficult; why can't I call myself an engineer and not be required to study it? It's racist and sexist anyway because it was created by Leibniz and Newton.It is fascinating to see the ideological contradictions at work here. One extended discussion concerns the 'rape culture' industry and the manner in which it argues, on one side, that women should be as promiscuous as men, as sexually indiscriminate as men and, thus, validate the claim that gender differences are not biological but cultural. At the same time, these women cry out for a culture of legal/sexual contracts, of kangaroo courts that deny the possibility of cross examination, legal representation or the kinds of evidentiary requirements consistent with the laws that obtain one inch beyond the university campus. We have both Babylon and a neoVictorian fainting-couch/ vapor-laden construct at the same time.The book is sad, frightening, enraging and utterly riveting. It is not particularly enjoyable to see one of the principal institutions of our society brought to the brink of destruction, particularly one that has served to utterly alter lives, hearts and minds and bring both titanic achievements and great social mobility. There may be hope in the fact that insanity generally does not persist forever. There is certainly evidence that students have fled from self-corrupted majors or, e.g., gone to new emphasis areas such as Creative Writing, that valorize art, form, craft, imagination and, sometimes, wisdom. When the tuition payers finally rise up in revolt it may catch the attention of the corporatists.Highly recommended. Every person who is concerned with the state of higher education should read this book.

Heather stays true to her form in bringing insightful facts to light, I couldn't believe how manipulative the "Left" has become. Heather destroys them with fact-based names dates and times relative to the issues she mentions.

My thirty-plus year career is in academia, and like many professors and administrators, I cringe at the idea of "safe spaces," of "trigger warnings," and of the presumed but non-existent "rape crisis" used by activists to protest sexual assaults. Mostly, however, I worry about the impact of lowered academic standards used to entice poorly qualified low-income and minority students - students who drop out, fail to graduate, drift into easy but worthless majors, and end up wasting years of their life and incurring large student debt. As Mac Donald shows, this practice undermines the intellectual standards of American higher education. It benefits mostly college administrators who use their "improved" diversity statistics to pander to politicians and campus activists, but at the expense of unprepared students who are exploited solely because of their dark skin or impoverished background.This is an intensely controversial topic, and Mac Donald tackles it head-on, backing up her assertions with detailed footnotes and references. Of course, she has her share of critics and is often (incorrectly) lumped in with the noisy, angry, Fox News and talk-radio side of the political right. In truth, MacDonald is a serious analyst with blue-chip credentials. (Unfortunately, her prose sometimes becomes excessively polemical, undermining her arguments.) She is outspoken, but speaks from facts and data. Her patron, financier Thomas W. Smith, is known as a respected intellectual conservative in the Friedrich Hayek mold. In short, Mac Donald's views need to be taken seriously. If you disagree with her, fine, but the burden is on you to show why she's wrong. Good luck with that.Admittedly, Mac Donald's book is something of a downer. She sees American higher education losing its preeminent position in the world because of declining competitiveness. American students are not working hard enough, are not assuming responsibility for their failures, and are not being pushed to excel. Mediocre work is praised, failure is rare, grades are inflated, and the value of a college degree is systematically undermined -- all in the name of increased student diversity at selective colleges. Mac Donald understands that these are fighting words but, unfortunately, the facts speak for themselves. Like it or not, it is rarely possible, she argues convincingly, to pluck a child from an impoverished background, who has attended weak schools, has struggled to read, has no math skills, and who has never experienced a challenging intellectual environment to blossom in college. That it happens occasionally proves nothing. The Harvards and Princetons of the world are adept at cherry picking the exceptions, but the millions of American students at the nation's large flagship public campuses pay the penalty of lowered expectations.The "fix" for this sorry situation is obvious: college presidents should show more backbone and stop kowtowing to campus activists. Boards of Trustees should insist on high academic graduation requirements and rigorous promotion and tenure requirements for professors. Admissions directors should do away with "holistic" admissions practices that are mostly an excuse for lowered academic requirements. States should invest more in failing schools, in pre-school education, in rigorous teacher training, in raising teacher salaries to attract better qualified applicants. MacDonald doesn't say so explicitly, but it's clear she thinks corrective systemic changes in American society are unlikely. Unfortunately, she is probably correct. No longer does America produce the best and the brightest and we have only ourselves to blame. Sadly, the future's Nobel Laureates, inventors, and business leaders are more likely to come from Beijing and Bangalore than from Cleveland and Chicago.

I was impressed with Heather's scholarship and her presenting the facts in an honest, thoughtful way. I was in college in the nineties, before political correctness got its claws into most academic curriculums. I read Shakespeare and T.S. Eliot and had no problem relating to their works; in fact, I actually. I agree with Miss Macdonald that admitting underrepresented minorities for the sake of admitting minorities is wrong and actually hurts minorities more than helps. Her writing style is straightforward and fairly accessible. I enjoyed reading it.

like the author for not just conforming to politically correct mantra

Diversity, buttressed by Equity and Inclusion, marches on to the present day. Heather Mac Donald’s book is an easy read covering some of the excesses that have marched through the Universities replacing knowledge and skill transmission with victimology.Diversity bureaucracies have vitiated the humanities and schools of education, according to the author, with science and medicine also (even in 2018) under threat.Have things improved over the last 5 years? Read and judge for yourself.

This is eye-opening. I've always felt as a white male who up until recently identified with purely left-wing ideoligy felt that I can't comprehend race and gender biases and that they must exist to such an extent for so many people in minority groups to feel oppressed, but what if the invisible oppression is merely that? What if it doesn't exist? What are the causes for relative "failure" by minority groups and are we really trying to help them? Are they really trying to help themselves? Can differences in groups be attributed by innate differences in those groups rather than due to direct oppression from the outside Word? Is it time to demolish the idea of groups and celebrate individual responsibility? Have we become so afraid to be racist in today's world that the only safe way to live is be racist enough to identify and favour those groups we don't belong to. I'm only half way through, but already this is something I would have benefitted from 10 years ago when I was trying to understand the supposed oppression we face.

ein wirklich wichtiger Insiderbericht ist hier zu lesen - so überauß politisch korrekt geht es an amerikanischen Universitäten zu, ob UCLA, Berkely, Yale, Harvard, Columbia - wo das Matratzenmädel Emma S. ihre Show abzog, wie McDonald zu berichten weiss, oder ihre eigene Denunzierung als "Faschistin", als sie einer Uni-Einladung zu einer Rede folgt und von der Polizei geschützt werden musste. Wir sollten lernen und aufpassen, dass unsere Universitäten noch Orte zum Austausch freier Meinungen bleiben und nicht des "pampering", wie McDonald schreibt, des Verwöhnprogramms, mit dem privilegierte Studentengruppen umsorgt werden, sobald sie einen Verdacht auf "Diskriminierung" äußern. Für mich als ehemaligen Anti-Apartheid-AKtivisten hat sich die Spirale von einem schlechten Extrem zum anderen gedreht. Unbedingt lesen!

A brilliant voice for our time.If we don’t restore the pursuit of truth in our universities, then they are doomed. Highly recommend Heather MacDonald and the Diversity Delusion.

images and videos more helpful than text alone.